2003-09-12 03:44:39 +08:00
|
|
|
<appendix role="dsssl" id="appendices-symlinks">
|
2002-07-08 04:28:42 +08:00
|
|
|
<?dbhtml filename="symlinks.html" dir="appendices"?>
|
2003-09-21 22:07:57 +08:00
|
|
|
<title>List of rc?.d symlinks used in <acronym>LFS</acronym>/<acronym>BLFS</acronym></title>
|
2002-07-08 04:28:42 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2002-07-20 03:57:00 +08:00
|
|
|
<para>This section lists all of the symlinks used by the lfs-bootscripts
|
2002-07-08 04:28:42 +08:00
|
|
|
package (correct as of version <userinput>1.9</userinput>) and all of
|
2003-09-21 22:07:57 +08:00
|
|
|
the scripts in the <acronym>BLFS</acronym> book. This is for two reasons:
|
|
|
|
|
first, so that you can see at a glance which number we have used for each
|
|
|
|
|
package, and second so that <emphasis>we</emphasis> can see which number we
|
|
|
|
|
have used for each package! Without this, it would make our lives more
|
2002-07-08 04:28:42 +08:00
|
|
|
difficult (as we'd probably end up with conflicts).</para>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
<para>It should go without saying that this is <emphasis>not</emphasis>
|
|
|
|
|
the only (or some would argue even optimal) setup for the symlinks. In
|
2003-09-27 05:14:55 +08:00
|
|
|
the <acronym>LFS</acronym> tradition, you should find what suits <emphasis>you
|
|
|
|
|
</emphasis> and use that; our recommendations are only a template.</para>
|
2002-07-08 04:28:42 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
&appendices-symlinks-rc0;
|
|
|
|
|
&appendices-symlinks-rc1;
|
|
|
|
|
&appendices-symlinks-rc2;
|
|
|
|
|
&appendices-symlinks-rc3;
|
|
|
|
|
&appendices-symlinks-rc4;
|
|
|
|
|
&appendices-symlinks-rc5;
|
|
|
|
|
&appendices-symlinks-rc6;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
</appendix>
|
