and update the note for editors after eating my own dogfood :-(
(dependencies I had listed in my test scripts were inadequate for
the two asymptote tests).
This only applies to texlive source, at least for TL2023 the
x86_64 binaries include luametatex. For source the luametatex
sources are not included. In the unlikely case that we have a
user who both builds texlive from source and uses context, let
them know before we release 12.0 in case another luatex
vulnerability is discovered before TL2024.
In 2023 we eventually discovered that the x86_64 binaries for
asymptote had not worked for at least 2 years, and we now have
a workaround for that. My 20230807 files are intended to show
which *collections* need to be added to schme-medium to allow
the various tests to run.
Also create an ENTITY for qt5 or qt5-alternate and use that
to specify the qt5 dependenies.
The complete KF5/plasma packages should use the full qt5 build, but
the lxqt kf5/plasma components only need qt5-alternate.
Well, my script did not handle package names with dashes correctly. So
some User Note links were mistakely removed. Recheck removed links
containing dashes and add them back if applicable.
So we can simply the instruction. Also remove a stale command
explanation referring to "configure script" (we are using meson now).
Simply the explanation for libkpathsea.so symlink in texlive too as we
don't distinguish "old" and "new" evince installations anymore. The
original explanation emphasizing "old" evince installation also does not
make sense to me: we have /etc/ld.so.conf addition which should be
enough for ld.so to find libkpathsea.so.6 when evince is used; and ld.so
only searches for "libkpathsea.so.6" (which is a DT_NEEDED entry in
evince libdvidocument.so), not unversioned libkpathsea.so.
