LFS-RPM/02-Multilib-Note.md
YellowJacketLinux 413556fd3a
Docfix document updates (#10)
* spell check

* Prep for new README

* Work on the new README

* FHS notes added

* tweaks

* GLibC bootstrap subversion etc.

* layers

* not needed

* work on layers

* rename

* layers work

* rename multilib

* rename again

* more file renaming

* stuff

* link fixes etc.

* cleaning up a bit

* spell fixes etc.

* nuke un-needed

* fips note

* spellfix

* started TOS

* ToC work
2023-04-28 03:08:59 -07:00

1.0 KiB

Multilib Plans

My build of LFS is 64-bit but is not multilib, meaning it does not support building or running 32-bit binaries.

My impression is that the biggest uses of a 32-bit compatible environment within 64-bit GNU/Linux is WINE (an environment for running some 32-bit Windows applications) and some games.

There also are some closed-source applications, like an AAC encoder that used to be popular before FFmpeg caught up, that were (or are) only available as 32-bit binaries.

Multilib is a low priority for me but when I do it, what I hope to do is install the 32-bit environment within /opt/compat-32 as the install prefix rather than /usr which then forces the use of /{,usr/}lib64 for the 64-bit libraries.

Another possibility is to use /{,usr/}lib32 for 32-bit libraries, but I would rather just put the 32-bit environment within /opt/compat-32 and not have to use bit-specific library directories.

I have no plans to support a 32-bit bit build of YJL. 64-bit systems have been the standard for about two decades now.